Idempotency ensures that running the same operation multiple times produces the same result as running it once. It works by tracking operation identifiers and returning cached results for duplicates instead of re-executing. For businesses, this prevents duplicate charges, orders, and notifications when retries occur. Without idempotency, network timeouts cause duplicate transactions.
The API times out, so your system retries. Now there are two charges on the card.
A webhook fires twice because the first response was slow. Two orders ship.
Network hiccups during a batch job. Half the records processed twice.
Safe retries require operations that produce the same result no matter how many times they run.
Part of the Quality & Reliability Layer
Idempotency ensures that running an operation multiple times produces exactly the same outcome as running it once. When you charge a payment with ID "pay_123", it results in one charge whether the request arrives once, twice, or ten times.
The mechanism is straightforward: track operation identifiers, check before executing, and return cached results for duplicates. Most implementations use idempotency keys - unique identifiers attached to requests that the server stores alongside results.
This matters because networks are unreliable. Requests timeout, connections drop, and clients retry. Without idempotency, every retry risks creating duplicates. With it, retries become safe and systems can recover from failures without human intervention.
Idempotency is not about preventing retries. It is about making retries safe. The goal is a system that can be hit with the same request a hundred times and produce exactly one result.
Idempotency solves a universal problem: how do you make actions safe to repeat? The same pattern appears anywhere failures lead to retries and retries risk duplication.
Before executing any operation with side effects, check if this exact request has been processed before. If yes, return the previous result. If no, execute the operation and store the result keyed to the request identifier.
Click the payment button multiple times to simulate network retries. Toggle idempotency to see what happens with and without duplicate protection.
pay_abc123_invoice_456UUID per request
Clients generate a unique key (typically a UUID) for each logical operation and include it with every request. The server stores results keyed by this identifier. Retries use the same key and get cached results.
Business identifiers
Use existing business identifiers as idempotency keys: invoice numbers, order IDs, transaction references. The operation is idempotent by design because the natural key already guarantees uniqueness.
Hash of request content
Generate a hash from request parameters (user ID, action, amount, timestamp window). Identical requests within a time window produce identical hashes and are treated as duplicates.
Answer a few questions to find the right implementation strategy.
Do you control the clients making requests?
A payment request is sent but the response never arrives due to network issues. The client retries automatically. Idempotency ensures the retry finds the already-processed payment and returns the original result instead of charging again.
Hover over any component to see what it does and why it's neededTap any component to see what it does and why it's needed
Animated lines show direct connections · Hover for detailsTap for details · Click to learn more
This component works the same way across every business. Explore how it applies to different situations.
Notice how the core pattern remains consistent while the specific details change
The operation completes, then you check if it was a duplicate. The side effect already happened. Now you have to undo it or live with the duplicate.
Instead: Always check for existing results before executing any operation with side effects.
Timestamps have millisecond or second resolution. Two requests in the same millisecond get the same key. Two different operations collide and one is incorrectly treated as a duplicate.
Instead: Use UUIDs, business identifiers, or composite keys that guarantee uniqueness.
Request A starts processing. Request B (same key) arrives before A finishes. B sees no stored result and also starts processing. Both complete and create duplicates.
Instead: Use database locks or a pending state to prevent concurrent execution of identical requests.
Idempotency means an operation produces the same result whether executed once or multiple times. A payment with ID "pay_123" always results in exactly one charge, even if the request is sent five times due to network issues. The system recognizes duplicate requests and returns the original result instead of re-executing.
Automation systems face network failures, timeouts, and retries constantly. Without idempotency, a failed API call that actually succeeded leads to duplicate actions when retried. This causes double charges, duplicate orders, and repeated notifications. Idempotency makes automation safe to retry, enabling robust error recovery without manual intervention.
Idempotency keys are unique identifiers attached to requests. The server stores the key with the operation result. When a request arrives with a previously seen key, the server returns the stored result instead of processing again. Keys typically expire after 24-48 hours. Clients generate keys using UUIDs or hash combinations of request parameters.
Any operation with side effects needs idempotency: payments, order creation, sending notifications, updating inventory, creating records. Read operations are naturally idempotent. Write operations require explicit idempotency design. Focus first on financial transactions and customer-facing actions where duplicates cause the most damage.
The most common mistake is checking for duplicates after the operation completes instead of before it starts. Another is using non-unique keys like timestamps that can collide. Some systems forget to handle the race condition where two identical requests arrive simultaneously. Always use database-level uniqueness constraints, not application-level checks alone.
Retry strategies determine when and how often to retry failed operations. Idempotency ensures those retries are safe. You need both: retry strategies handle transient failures by trying again, while idempotency ensures repeated attempts do not cause duplicate side effects. They work together for reliable distributed systems.
Have a different question? Let's talk
Choose the path that matches your current situation
You have no idempotency protection on your write operations
Some operations are idempotent but coverage is inconsistent
Most operations are idempotent but edge cases remain
Idempotency makes individual operations safe to retry. The next step is understanding how to handle failures across entire workflows and prevent cascading problems.