Task routing automatically directs work items to the right person, team, or system based on type, priority, and skills. It evaluates tasks against routing rules and assigns them without manual triage. For businesses, this means faster response times and better workload distribution. Without it, work sits in shared queues waiting for someone to claim it.
A support ticket comes in. It sits in the general queue for 47 minutes.
Three people look at it, realize it needs someone else, and move on.
The fourth person finally claims it. The customer has already emailed again, frustrated.
Work does not get done faster by being visible to everyone. It gets done faster by reaching the right person first.
ORCHESTRATION LAYER - Ensures work flows to the right handler without manual triage.
Task routing evaluates incoming work items and directs them to the appropriate person, team, or system based on attributes like type, priority, required skills, and current workload. Instead of dumping everything into a shared queue and hoping someone claims it, routing makes an intelligent assignment decision.
The routing logic can be simple (support tickets go to the support team) or sophisticated (high-priority tickets from enterprise customers about billing go to the senior finance specialist who is currently available). The goal is always the same: minimize time-to-handler while maximizing match quality.
Most teams think they need more people when they actually need better routing. The same team handles 2x the volume when work reaches the right person the first time.
Task routing solves a universal problem: how do you match incoming work to the right handler when you have multiple options? The same pattern appears anywhere work flows to people or systems.
Work arrives with attributes. Routing rules evaluate those attributes against handler capabilities and availability. The system assigns work to the best match without human triage.
Configure a support ticket and watch the routing logic find the best handler based on skills, authorization level, and current workload.
Match attributes to handlers with explicit rules
Define rules like "if priority is high AND category is billing, route to finance team." Rules are evaluated in order until a match is found. Simple to understand, easy to audit, but can become complex with many conditions.
Score handlers and pick the best match
Each potential handler gets a score based on factors like skill match, current workload, response time history, and availability. The highest-scoring handler gets the assignment. More nuanced than simple rules.
Distribute evenly while respecting requirements
Rotate through qualified handlers to ensure even distribution. Constraints filter who qualifies. Good for teams where any qualified person can handle the work and fairness matters.
Answer a few questions to get a recommendation tailored to your situation.
How many potential handlers do you have?
An enterprise customer submits a billing question. Task routing evaluates the ticket type (billing), customer tier (enterprise), and available handlers to automatically assign it to the senior finance specialist who handles enterprise accounts and has capacity.
Hover over any component to see what it does and why it's neededTap any component to see what it does and why it's needed
Animated lines show direct connections . Hover for detailsTap for details . Click to learn more
This component works the same way across every business. Explore how it applies to different situations.
Notice how the core pattern remains consistent while the specific details change
You route all high-priority items to your best performer. They burn out while others sit idle. The priority was captured but the workload was not. Soon your star performer quits and you have no backup.
Instead: Always include workload and availability in routing logic. Priority determines importance, not assignment.
A task comes in that matches no routing rules. It sits in limbo. Nobody sees it because no handler is assigned. The customer waits days for a response that should have taken hours.
Instead: Always define a default route. "If nothing else matches, go to the general queue with an alert to the team lead."
Your routing sends billing questions to finance. But the finance specialist is on vacation, in a different timezone, or already handling 40 open items. The routing was technically correct but practically wrong.
Instead: Include real-time factors like availability, timezone, and current queue depth. Route to who can actually respond.
Task routing is the process of automatically directing work items to the appropriate handler based on predefined rules. It evaluates task attributes like type, priority, customer tier, and required skills, then matches them with available resources. This eliminates manual triage and ensures work reaches the right person without sitting in a general queue.
Implement task routing when manual assignment becomes a bottleneck. Signs include: work sitting unassigned while people wait, the same person triaging all incoming requests, delays because tasks go to wrong teams first, or uneven workload distribution. If you have more than 50 tasks per day flowing to multiple handlers, routing pays for itself quickly.
The biggest mistake is routing based on a single attribute. A high-priority task still needs the right skills to handle it. Another mistake is ignoring workload. Routing everything to the best performer burns them out while others sit idle. Finally, avoid static routing that does not adapt. Yesterday optimal assignment may create bottlenecks today.
Task assignment is the act of giving work to someone. Task routing is the logic that determines who gets it. Assignment might be manual or automatic. Routing is always rule-based. A manager manually assigning tasks is doing assignment. A system evaluating priority, skills, and availability to pick the right handler is doing routing.
Start with task type and required skills. Add priority level and customer tier if they affect SLAs. Include current workload and availability to prevent overloading. Consider timezone for follow-the-sun support. Geographic location matters for on-site work. As you learn patterns, add attributes that reduce re-routing and improve first-time accuracy.
Have a different question? Let's talk
Choose the path that matches your current situation
You have a shared queue with no routing
You route by type but still have bottlenecks
Routing works but you want better performance
You have learned how to direct work to the right handler automatically. The natural next step is understanding what happens when the assigned handler cannot complete the work and it needs to escalate.