You have 47 items in your inbox. Every one marked "urgent."
You treat them all the same. Work through them one by one.
Three hours later, you discover item #43 was a ticking time bomb that just went off.
It needed attention this morning. Not after you finished the other 42.
Not all problems have the same cost if you miss them.
INTERMEDIATE - Builds on classification to add consequence-based prioritization.
Risk scoring assigns a number to potential negative outcomes. Not "how important is this?" but "how bad is it if we miss this?" A late reply to a frustrated VIP customer costs more than a late reply to a routine inquiry. Same action, different consequences.
The score considers multiple factors: financial exposure, relationship value, time sensitivity, and how far things have already escalated. A $50,000 contract renewal with one week left scores differently than a $500 question that can wait.
Risk scoring is not the same as priority scoring. Priority says "do this first." Risk says "this will hurt the most if you drop it." The highest priority item might not be the highest risk, and vice versa.
Risk scoring solves a universal problem: when everything feels urgent, you need a way to identify what actually has consequences if delayed.
Assign weights to consequence factors (financial impact, time decay, escalation level, relationship value). Combine them into a single score. Use thresholds to trigger different handling paths. The score answers "what do we lose if this slips?"
Drag the sliders to change what factors matter most. Watch high-risk items rise to the top.
Try setting Financial to 80% and watch big accounts jump to the top. Then try Time at 80% and watch urgent deadlines take over.
What is the dollar amount at stake
A contract renewal worth $50,000 carries more weight than a $200 refund request. The system pulls deal value, account size, or transaction amount and factors it into the score.
How quickly does risk increase
Some items get worse the longer you wait. A contract expiring in 3 days has higher risk than one expiring in 30 days. Deadlines, SLAs, and escalation timers all contribute to time-based risk.
How far has this already progressed
First contact is lower risk than third follow-up. Tone analysis can detect frustration. A calm inquiry is not the same as someone threatening to escalate. Past interactions inform current risk.
Your team has 200 items in queue and capacity for 50 today. This flow identifies the 15 items that will cause real damage if delayed. Not "most important" but "most costly to miss." The difference between a busy day and a crisis.
Hover over any component to see what it does and why it's neededTap any component to see what it does and why it's needed
Animated lines show direct connections 路 Hover for detailsTap for details 路 Click to learn more
If everything is high risk, nothing is. Your team ignores the scores because they are meaningless. The person who cried wolf loses all credibility.
Instead: Force distribution. Only 10-15% should be high risk. If more than that triggers, your thresholds are wrong.
A small account can do massive reputational damage. A large account with no deadline pressure is not urgent. Money matters, but so does timing and escalation.
Instead: Weight multiple factors. Financial exposure is one input, not the whole score.
You set "high risk" at 80 points. Six months later, you have no idea if items above 80 actually caused more problems than items below. You are flying blind.
Instead: Track outcomes. Did high-risk items actually result in negative outcomes? Adjust thresholds based on real data.
You know how to quantify potential negative outcomes and identify what needs protection. The natural next step is learning how risk scores combine with other factors to determine overall priority.