Wait states are intentional pauses in workflow execution that synchronize with external constraints. They pause for time periods, poll for conditions, or await human actions before proceeding. For businesses, this means workflows that respect API rate limits and wait for dependencies to complete. Without wait states, workflows race ahead and fail when external systems are not ready.
Your automation fires instantly. The external API rate-limits you. Everything breaks.
Your workflow sends 50 requests in one second. The receiving system flags you as a bot.
Your process runs too fast. The dependency it needs has not finished yet.
Speed without timing is chaos. Strategic pauses make systems reliable.
ORCHESTRATION LAYER - Controls when workflows pause and when they proceed.
Making workflows wait for the right moment
Wait states pause workflow execution until a specific condition is met or a time period passes. Instead of racing forward and hitting walls, the workflow pauses strategically, then continues when conditions are right.
This is not about slowing things down. It is about synchronizing with reality. External APIs have rate limits. Dependent processes need time to complete. Human approvals take hours, not milliseconds. Wait states align your workflow with these external constraints.
The fastest workflow is not the one that executes quickest. It is the one that completes successfully on the first try because it respects the timing requirements of every system it touches.
Wait states solve a universal problem: how do you coordinate action when not everything is ready at the same moment? The same pattern appears anywhere timing matters for success.
Reach a point that requires external synchronization. Pause execution while preserving state. Monitor for the resumption condition. Continue when the condition is satisfied.
The API allows 3 requests per second. Toggle wait states on or off, then click Run to see what happens when you send 8 requests.
Three types of waiting that workflows need
Wait for a specific duration
The workflow pauses for a fixed or randomized time period. After 5 minutes, continue. After a random interval between 3 and 5 minutes, continue. Simple, predictable, and useful for rate limiting.
Wait until something becomes true
The workflow polls or subscribes to an external state. When the payment clears, continue. When the file appears, continue. When the approval is granted, continue. The workflow proceeds only when reality matches requirements.
Wait for human action
The workflow pauses until a person takes action. A manager must approve. A customer must confirm. A team member must verify. The system notifies the human and waits for their response.
Answer a few questions to get a recommendation tailored to your situation.
What are you waiting for?
The ops team needs to sync 500 customer records. The CRM API allows 100 requests per minute. The marketing platform requires enriched data. Without wait states, the workflow hits rate limits at record 101 and fails. With wait states, it paces requests and waits for enrichment before proceeding.
Hover over any component to see what it does and why it's neededTap any component to see what it does and why it's needed
Animated lines show direct connections · Hover for detailsTap for details · Click to learn more
This component works the same way across every business. Explore how it applies to different situations.
Notice how the core pattern remains consistent while the specific details change
You set a 30-second wait before checking if a file is ready. Sometimes the file is ready in 5 seconds. Sometimes it takes 2 minutes. Your fixed delay either wastes time or fails because the file is not ready.
Instead: Use condition-based waits with polling or events. Check for the actual state rather than guessing how long it takes.
Your workflow checks every 100 milliseconds whether the external API has completed. You generate 600 requests per minute to an API that only needs to be checked once every 10 seconds. You hit rate limits and get blocked.
Instead: Match polling frequency to the expected completion time. Start with longer intervals and decrease only if needed.
Your workflow waits indefinitely for an approval that never comes. The approver is on vacation. The email went to spam. Days later, you discover 50 workflows stuck in limbo.
Instead: Set maximum wait times with escalation or fallback paths. If no response in 24 hours, escalate. If no response in 72 hours, auto-reject.
Wait states are intentional pauses in workflow execution. They halt processing until a condition is met: a time period passes, an external system signals completion, or a human takes action. Unlike errors that stop workflows, wait states are planned pauses that preserve workflow state and resume automatically when conditions are satisfied. They are essential for coordinating with rate-limited APIs, dependent processes, and human approvers.
Use time-based delays when the required wait duration is predictable, like API rate limits that reset every minute. Use condition-based waits when completion time varies, like waiting for a file upload or payment processing. Condition-based waits are more efficient because they resume immediately when ready, while time-based delays always wait the full duration regardless of actual completion.
Wait states prevent rate limit violations by pacing requests. If an API allows 100 requests per minute, a 600ms delay between requests stays under the limit. Without delays, workflows burst all requests immediately, hit the rate limit, and fail. Some APIs require randomized delays to avoid detection as automation. Wait states can generate random intervals within a range for human-like pacing.
Without timeout handling, workflows waiting for conditions that never occur will wait indefinitely. This creates stuck workflows that consume resources and block downstream processes. Always implement maximum wait times with fallback actions: escalate to another approver after 24 hours, retry with different parameters after 5 attempts, or fail gracefully with alerts after the timeout expires.
Human approval waits require notification, visibility, and timeout handling. Send clear notifications with action links when approval is needed. Provide status dashboards so requesters can see where things stand. Set escalation rules: remind after 4 hours, escalate after 24 hours, auto-reject after 72 hours. Humans operate on hours and days, so design wait logic for those timelines.
Polling waits check a condition at regular intervals until it becomes true. Event-driven waits subscribe to notifications and pause until signaled. Polling is simpler but less efficient for long waits since it repeatedly queries the system. Event-driven waits are more efficient because they consume no resources while waiting, resuming instantly when the signal arrives.
Have a different question? Let's talk
Choose the path that matches your current situation
You have not implemented any wait logic yet
You are using fixed delays but hitting issues
Wait logic works but you want better reliability
You have learned how to pause workflows strategically and resume when conditions are right. The natural next step is understanding how to save state so interrupted workflows can continue from where they stopped.